06.0163 · THE CHART · Engagement record · specimen view

Admen · · ENGAGEMENT RECORDS · FILE № 0163
BY APPLICATION · ~6 / QUARTER SPECIMEN · № 0163

PATIENT

BEHAVIORAL HEALTH · NORTHEAST

NAME · ██████████████

ADMITTED

████ ████

DISCHARGED

████ ████

ATTENDING

Admen partners

OUTCOME · ON FILE

Intake rebuilt across a twelve-location outpatient group; the no-show curve and the cost of each new client are the vitals under management.

Specimen view. This client's compiled numbers stay sealed — by policy, not by mood. The structure below is exact. Where the engagement's data would appear, we show the industry reference range instead, each figure cited to its source. Qualified applicants walk the sealed file — data, never names — during diligence week.

NATURE OF THE ENGAGEMENT

Presenting condition in this engagement type: an outpatient behavioral health group whose intake function grew one location at a time and never became a system. Calls route differently at every site, screening criteria live in individual staff heads, and the published literature says what happens next — outpatient behavioral health programs in the STAR-SI study carried a 37.4% no-show rate before process work began, and 29–42% of people who reach out to addiction treatment never begin it at all. The client's own baseline is sealed in the record; the reference ranges above are what this condition looks like across the industry.

The operation is structural, not promotional. Intake gets rebuilt as one pathway: a single scheduling spine across all locations, screening scripted to clinical criteria instead of habit, reminder sequences engineered to the no-show evidence base, and paid demand routed only into slots the intake team can actually answer. Behavioral health carries the most expensive acquisition economics in healthcare — industry benchmarks put average cost per acquired client at $1,200–$2,000 — so every lead that dies in a voicemail queue is a four-figure write-off. The work is closing those seams.

What gets measured: no-show rate by location and appointment type, failure-to-begin-treatment rate from first contact, cost per qualified lead against the published $297 blended benchmark for the category, and paid-channel lead-to-qualified conversion against the ~50% rate that referral relationships demonstrate is achievable. Targets shown are the industry baselines adjusted by ADMEN's standard structural-lift factors, stated to the same precision as the source figures. Compiled client data remains sealed by policy.

VITALS — INDUSTRY BASELINE vs ADMEN TARGET

MEASURE INDUSTRY TARGET Δ
No-show rate (outpatient behavioral health) 37.4% 12.0% −25.4 pt
Failure-to-begin-treatment rate (first contact to first session) 29–42% 9–13% −20 to −29 pt
Client acquisition cost (behavioral health / addiction treatment) $1,200–$2,000 $500–$840 −$700 to −$1,160
Cost per qualified lead (addiction treatment, blended) $297 $125 −$172
Paid-channel lead-to-qualified rate ~21% ~50% +29 pt (capped at the ~50% referral-channel benchmark)

Targets apply Admen's published structural-lift factors to the cited industry baselines. They are planning references, not promises — the examination sets the real numbers.

SOURCES — REFERENCE RANGES

  1. 1. Molfenter T., Reducing Appointment No-Shows: Going from Theory to Practice — Substance Use & Misuse (2013) — Outpatient no-show reduced 37.4% → 19.9% across 67 STAR-SI organizations; cited literature: 29–42% fail to begin addiction treatment
  2. 2. BSPKN — Patient Acquisition Cost in 2026: Healthcare Marketing Benchmarks — Behavioral health / addiction treatment average PAC $1,200–$2,000 (low $500, high $4,000+)
  3. 3. First Page Sage — Average Cost Per Lead by Industry (2026 report) — Addiction treatment blended CPL $297 (paid $380, organic $213)
  4. 4. Recovery.com — What Good Looks Like in Behavioral Health Marketing — Paid channels lead-to-qualified ~21%; referral partnerships ~50%