Twelve-location family group presenting with market-wide new-client decline; acquisition system built, measured, and handed off to the in-house team.

Specimen view. This client's compiled numbers stay sealed — by policy, not by mood. The structure below is exact. Where the engagement's data would appear, we show the industry reference range instead, each figure cited to its source. Qualified applicants walk the sealed file — data, never names — during diligence week.

NATURE OF THE ENGAGEMENT

Typical intake picture for a family-owned group at this scale: twelve locations making twelve separate marketing decisions, no shared measurement of what a new client costs, and new-client flow drifting with the industry — the 2025 iVET360 benchmark report recorded new client acquisition down 9.5% and visits down 4% across 1,500+ practices in 2024. The chart opens with a full workup: call tracking on every line, channel-level attribution, and a per-location baseline before anything is prescribed.

What gets operated on in this engagement type: a centralized client-acquisition engine that each location plugs into rather than reinvents — paid search restructured against the industry's $84 median cost-per-acquisition, front-desk call conversion instrumented and coached, and a layered reminder system attacking the 9–11% no-show band that unmanaged schedules sit in. Visit cadence is treated as a vital sign, not an afterthought; the industry's average interval between visits has stretched to 85.8 days, and recall infrastructure is how it gets pulled back.

What gets measured: new clients per location per month, blended and per-channel acquisition cost, no-show rate, and days between visits — reviewed on a monthly operating cadence until the numbers hold without us. Discharge criteria for a family-owned group is a system the family's own team can run; this record closed at handoff. Figures on this chart are cited industry reference ranges holding the places where compiled engagement data sits; client records are sealed by policy.

VITALS — INDUSTRY BASELINE vs ADMEN TARGET

MEASURE	INDUSTRY	TARGET	Δ
New clients (YoY change, industry)	−9.5% YoY	+99.1% YoY	+108.6 pts
Client acquisition cost (paid search CPA)	$84.00	$35.28	−58%
Paid-search conversion rate	5.8%	20.0%	+245%
Appointment no-show rate	9–11%	3–3.5%	−68%
Average interval between visits	85.8 days	57.6 days	−33%

Targets apply Admen's published structural-lift factors to the cited industry baselines. They are planning references, not promises — the examination sets the real numbers.

SOURCES — REFERENCE RANGES

1. Today's Veterinary Business — iVET360 2025 Benchmark Report — New client acquisition fell 9.5%; client visits declined 4%; ATC +6.1% (2024 data, 1,500+ practices)
2. Benchmarketing — Veterinary Specialist Marketing Benchmarks — Google Ads CPA $84.00; Google Ads conversion rate 5.8%; medians Q1 2023–Q4 2024
3. Medigy — veterinary no-show reminder strategies — Veterinary clinics lose 9 to 11 percent of scheduled appointments to no-shows; well-managed target below 5%
4. AVMA — Less foot traffic at veterinary practices — Average interval between visits 85.8 days (2023–24) vs 57.6 days (2020–21), Vetsource data

FILED BY

Admen '26

← RECORDS ROOM APPLY — 6 / QUARTER →