DX / Differentials / BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
D-05 — PREPARING FOR SALE · BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Growth has to read as a system — behavioral health
Growth has to read as a system, not a good year
PRESENTATION — WHAT THE OPERATOR SEES
Census is up, the last two years look strong, and a banker has been in the building. The question on the table is whether a buyer will read the growth as repeatable or as a good run — and right now the answer lives in the founder's head, the referral relationships are personal, and nobody can produce a same-facility operating table for the last eight quarters. A second question is worth asking early: whoever quoted you a multiple, where did it come from?
DIFFERENTIAL — LIKELY CAUSES, MOST LIKELY FIRST
- 01
Census growth is not attributed to anything a buyer can diligence
Growth with no documented demand origin reads as luck or as one relationship. Diligence tests durability, and durability means a named, transferable source for the admissions you booked.
Self or individual referral accounts for 49.7% of admissions nationally and is the largest single source — larger than every professional source combined. But of 1,625,833 TEDS records, 267,269 had an unknown referral source and 66,540 did not collect it at all. Even the federal dataset loses a substantial share of attribution; a private operator with no CRM discipline loses more.
SAMHSA TEDS 2023, Table D-1
NOT THIS IF — Every admission for 24 months carries a named referral source in the system of record and the source-level trend is visible.
- 02
You cannot produce the operating table the comparables publish
Buyers diligence against public comparables because those are the only disclosures that exist. If the two public pure-plays publish a specific same-facility table and you cannot, the gap itself is the finding — regardless of how good the underlying business is.
UHS publishes, for behavioral health: average licensed beds 24,087, average available beds 23,987, patient days 6,415,058, average daily census 17,575.5, occupancy 73.0% on licensed and 73.3% on available beds, admissions 469,571 and length of stay 13.7 — same-facility and all-facility, with prior-year comparatives. Acadia publishes same-facility revenue +4.9%, patient days +2.1%, admissions +2.3%, ALOS −0.2% and revenue per patient day +2.8% for FY2025.
Universal Health Services FY2025 Form 10-K; Acadia Healthcare FY2025 Form 10-K
NOT THIS IF — You already close eight quarters of admissions, patient days, ADC, ALOS, occupancy and revenue per patient day per facility.
- 03
Scale, not performance, is the constraint on who will look
Much of the M&A data operators read excludes deals below a revenue floor. Below it, you are not absent from the market — you are absent from the dataset the market reads, and from the buyer list that reads it.
Provident Healthcare Partners, which states its methodology as "excludes subscale transactions with less than $5M of revenue," recorded 4 platform, 13 add-on and 5 secondary transactions with 15 unique buyers in Q1 2026 — and zero substance use disorder transactions at that threshold. Mertz Taggart, which applies no revenue floor, counted 5 addiction treatment deals the same quarter, down from 7 in Q4 2025 and 8 in Q1 2025. The Braff Group notes that mental health is dominated by providers with one — maybe two — offices and that the number of multi-office providers with $10–15M or more in revenue is extremely limited; Census County Business Patterns 2023 corroborates it, with 36,309 of 46,513 offices of mental health practitioners under five employees.
Provident Healthcare Partners, Behavioral Health M&A Market Update Q1 2026; Mertz Taggart, Q1 2026 Behavioral Health M&A Report; The Braff Group, Behavioral Health M&A Year in Review 2023; US Census Bureau, County Business Patterns 2023
NOT THIS IF — You are comfortably above the $5M revenue threshold with multiple sites — then the question is quality of earnings, not visibility.
- 04
Concentration in payer, referral and labour is doing the pricing
A buyer models the labour line and the payer mix before it models growth. Both are structural in behavioral health, and both are where a strong-looking business gets repriced.
UHS reported salaries, wages and benefits at 54.0% of behavioral health net revenues in 2025 (53.6% in 2024). Acadia's payer mix is Medicaid 57.7%, commercial 24.6%, Medicare 14.3%, other 3.4%. NABH's tabulation of the 2016 CMS Hospital Cost Report found more than half of the nation's 1,738 inpatient psychiatric facilities had negative net operating margins, averaging −5% (2016 vintage — do not read as current). NABH's 2019 survey of 62 facilities put regulatory compliance cost at just under $1 million per facility, over $18,000 per licensed bed, and $6,747 per 100 days of inpatient psychiatric care.
Universal Health Services FY2025 Form 10-K; Acadia Healthcare FY2025 Form 10-K; NABH, The High Cost of Compliance (2019)
NOT THIS IF — Payer mix is diversified, labour is at or below the public comparable's share of net revenue, and no single referral source carries more than a modest share of admissions.
- 05
The multiple you are anchored on is probably not real
Anchoring on a fabricated valuation range sets the wrong preparation priorities and the wrong timeline. In this vertical the most SEO-visible multiple ladders are broker pricing narratives, and two of them carry attributions to firms whose actual documents contain no multiples at all.
No credible source publishes an EBITDA multiple for residential substance use treatment as a distinct segment. The Braff Group has the deepest sub-segmentation available anywhere — SUD split into residential high-end, residential mid-range-to-value, outpatient PHP/IOP/counseling, MAT, sober living and specialty — and publishes counts only, never multiples. Capstone Partners' Behavioral Healthcare Services Market Update contains no valuation multiples of any kind. Provident's Q2, Q3 and Q4 2025 and Q1 2026 behavioral health newsletters contain none. The detailed ladders in circulation attributing ranges to Capstone and Provident are not in those firms' documents.
The Braff Group, Behavioral Health M&A Year in Review 2023; Capstone Partners, Behavioral Healthcare Services Market Update, 22 October 2025; Provident Healthcare Partners quarterly behavioral health newsletters, Q2 2025 – Q1 2026 — all read directly
NOT THIS IF — Your range came from a live process with named comparable transactions and a stated basis. Then it is a real range for your business, which is different from an industry figure.
HOW TO TELL THEM APART
How to tell these apart in your own numbers
Each of these is a measurement you can run yourself, without us.
01 · Census growth is not attributed to anything a buyer can diligence
Share of admissions in the last 24 months carrying a named referral source in the system of record, and the concentration of those sources — top source share, top five share.
CONFIRMS IF
A large share is unattributed, or attribution exists but one relationship carries an outsized share of admissions. Both read as key-person risk in diligence.
EXCLUDES IF
Attribution is near-complete and no single source dominates. Then growth has a documented, transferable engine.
02 · You cannot produce the operating table the comparables publish
Attempt to produce, per facility, for eight quarters: admissions, patient days, average daily census, ALOS (patient days ÷ admissions), occupancy on a single stated bed basis, and revenue per patient day. Then reconcile the total to the income statement.
CONFIRMS IF
It cannot be produced from the current systems, or the reconciliation fails. That gap is the pre-exit workplan.
EXCLUDES IF
It closes monthly, reconciles, and has a prior-year comparative — the format the comparables publish.
03 · Scale, not performance, is the constraint on who will look
LTM revenue and adjusted EBITDA against the $5M revenue floor that Provident applies, and against Braff's observation about multi-office providers at $10–15M or more.
CONFIRMS IF
You sit below the floor. Deal flow at your size still happens — Mertz Taggart counts deals Provident excludes — but the buyer set is different and the process is different. Plan accordingly rather than expecting the platform-scale narrative.
EXCLUDES IF
You are above it, multi-site, and already appear in the transaction datasets by segment.
04 · Concentration in payer, referral and labour is doing the pricing
Payer mix by percentage of net revenue; salaries, wages and benefits as a share of net revenue; contract and licence renewal dates; the share of admissions from your single largest referral source.
CONFIRMS IF
Labour runs above the public comparable's 54.0%, or one payer or referral source dominates. Both are pricing conversations, and both are better raised by you than found by a buyer.
EXCLUDES IF
Mix is diversified and labour is at or below the comparable share.
05 · The multiple you are anchored on is probably not real
Ask whoever quoted the multiple for the transaction basis, sample size and date range. Then open the document they cite and search it for the number.
CONFIRMS IF
There is no basis, or the cited firm's document does not contain the figure. Capstone's and Provident's do not, and that is checkable in an afternoon.
EXCLUDES IF
The range comes from a named set of comparable transactions with disclosed terms, or from a live process.
WHAT RESOLVES EACH
What resolves this, and how you will know it resolved
| Census growth is not attributed to anything a buyer can diligence | Rx 05 · preparing for sale → | Attribution is the first pre-exit fix because it takes the longest to accumulate. Two years of named-source admissions data cannot be assembled retroactively in a diligence window. |
| You cannot produce the operating table the comparables publish | Rx 04 · marketing attribution → | Close the same-facility table monthly and reconcile it to the income statement. The format is already public — the two behavioral health comparables print it in their 10-Ks and it costs nothing to adopt. |
| Scale, not performance, is the constraint on who will look | Rx 05 · preparing for sale → | If you are sub-scale, the honest answer may be that the right move is another 18 months of same-facility growth or one tuck-in, not a process now. We would say so rather than dress the business for a buyer set that is not looking at it. |
| Concentration in payer, referral and labour is doing the pricing | Rx 05 · preparing for sale → | Surface concentration in the materials with the mitigation attached. Labour and payer mix are structural in this vertical and a buyer knows it; what damages price is discovering them late. |
| The multiple you are anchored on is probably not real | Rx 05 · preparing for sale → | There is no honest published residential SUD multiple, so we will not quote one and we would treat anyone who does as a signal about the adviser. What we can do is prepare the disclosure set the real buyers ask for, which is what moves a range in a live process. |
WHAT "RESOLVED" LOOKS LIKE — A same-facility operating table a buyer can diligence, plus documented same-facility growth
MEDIAN
Not published. No distribution of operating metrics exists for private behavioral health operators — the only published comparables are individual public companies, and the residential SUD valuation cell is honestly empty.
TOP DECILE
The public comparables, as disclosed: Acadia FY2025 same-facility revenue +4.9%, patient days +2.1%, admissions +2.3%, revenue per patient day +2.8% (FY2024: +7.7%, +3.2%, +1.3%, +4.3%). UHS FY2025 same-facility net revenues +7.7% ($516M), income before income taxes 20.5% of net revenues, ADC 17,575.5 on 23,987 average available beds at 73.3% occupancy, ALOS 13.7.
TARGET
Eight quarters of the comparables' table produced per facility and reconciled to the income statement, with same-facility revenue growth in the range the largest public pure-plays posted — Acadia's +4.9% in FY2025 and +7.7% in FY2024 bracket what durable growth looks like at scale. That is a position against named comparables, not a percentile and not a promise; no distribution exists to be in a decile of.
Acadia Healthcare FY2025 Form 10-K; Universal Health Services FY2025 Form 10-K; Provident Healthcare Partners and The Braff Group (deal structure and segment counts only — neither publishes multiples)
HOW THIS DIFFERS BY SCALE
How this differs by scale
| Single site | Single site: the buyer is often a local operator or an individual, and the diligence is the founder. The work is transferring the referral relationships onto named staff and out of one person's phone. Note the market floor is real — Praesum was acquired out of a Chapter 11 auction for $18.5 million in the same period that venture money was going elsewhere in behavioral health. |
| Group | Small group: the same-facility table per site is the deliverable, and site-level variance will be priced — which makes census and length-of-stay reporting a pre-exit exhibit rather than an operating nicety. Segment structure matters — Braff's counts show high-end residential ran 13–18 deals a year in 2014–2016 and 3 in 2023, while outpatient PHP/IOP/counseling hit a record 17 in 2023. Which sub-segment you are in changes who is buying. |
| Platform | Platform: private-equity-backed platforms have accounted for more than 60% of all behavioral health deal flow since 2018, and 2025 closed with 180 transactions on Mertz Taggart's count against 176 in 2024 — mental health 111, autism/I-DD 36, addiction treatment 33. Note the counters disagree by method (LevinPro counted 104 publicly announced transactions in 2025); pick one series and stay in it rather than blending them in a board deck. |
OTHER PRESENTATIONS — BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
- Census is flat while admissions hold
- Cost per admission is climbing
- Inquiries arrive; admissions do not
- Same brand, three different businesses
A differential narrows the field. It does not replace the examination — that is what the six weeks are for. Every figure above is an industry reference range, not a client's numbers; those stay sealed. Sources are set out at /sources.
APPLY — 6 / QUARTER →