REFERENCE — INDUSTRY BASELINE, CITED
Reference ranges, by specialty
What a practice in your specialty actually looks like — median, quartile and top decile — measured by the institutions with a real denominator. Every figure below was read in the primary document itself rather than in someone's summary of it, and every one names its source in the row.
These are industry baselines, not our clients' numbers — those stay sealed. What we publish is the reference range and where it came from. How we rank a source, and which sources we refuse to use, is set out at /sources.
JUMP TO
- DSO & GENERAL DENTISTRY →
- SPECIALTY DENTAL →
- VETERINARY →
- DERMATOLOGY →
- BEHAVIORAL HEALTH →
- EMERGENCY & URGENT CARE →
- MULTI-SPECIALTY MSO →
- OPTOMETRY →
- PE PLATFORMS & ROLLUPS →
DSO & general dentistry
WHO WE TREAT →Production and collections — not revenue.
| MEASURE | BASELINE | SPREAD | SOURCE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross billings per owner GP | avg $965,660 · median $893,510 | Q1 $583,410 · Q3 $1,198,710 · n=423 | ADA HPI, 2026 Survey of Dental Practice, Tbl 5 |
| Gross billings per owner specialist | avg $1,213,040 · median $993,490 | n=126 | ADA HPI, Tbl 5 |
| Gross billings per visit, solo GP | avg $576.30 · median $480.70 | Q1 $334.50 · Q3 $764.00 | ADA HPI, Tbl 9 |
| Gross billings per practice hour | avg $621.10 · median $529.20 | solo GP | ADA HPI, Tbl 9 |
| New patients / location / month | avg 39 · top 10% 82 | 45–65 strong · 65–81 approaching top | Henry Schein One, 2026 Catalyst Index |
| New patients / month / practice | avg 46 (2025) · 43 (2024) | different population, different mean | Planet DDS, 2026 Outlook |
| Distribution of monthly new patients | 0–19: 38.8% · 20–39: 19.0% · 40–59: 14.9% · 60–79: 9.5% · 80+: 17.7% | the curve behind both averages | Planet DDS, 2026 Deep Dive |
| Daily production per provider | $8,764 (2025) · $8,436 (2024) | hygienist $1,058 | Planet DDS |
| Revenue per chair — DSO | avg $205,690 · median $156,741 | across 59,139 chairs | Planet DDS |
| Revenue per chair — solo | avg $236,286 · median $184,502 | solos out-earn groups per chair | Planet DDS |
| Friday vs Tuesday production | $7,388 vs $10,152 | Friday 27% lower | Planet DDS |
| National dental expenditure | $189B (2024) | 3.6% of total health spend | CMS, National Health Expenditure Accounts |
Two credible sources report 39 and 46 new patients per month; a practising operator with three decades in the field reports 12–20 as typical. All three are right. The distribution row shows why — 38.8% of practices sit under 20, and a long right tail pulls the mean up. Any single “industry average” for this metric conceals more than it reveals.
Specialty dental
WHO WE TREAT →Starts and referrals — a referral is not a lead. In orthodontics, “retention” means retainers.
| MEASURE | BASELINE | SPREAD | SOURCE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case starts, solo ortho | median 334 | calendar 2022 | 2023 JCO Orthodontic Practice Study, Tbl 1 |
| New-patient consultations | median 471 | observation patients 243 | JCO, Tbl 1 |
| Active treatment cases | median 700 | patients per day 50 | JCO, Tbl 1 |
| Gross income, solo ortho | median $1,800,000 | expenses $910,000 · net $741,771 · overhead 56% | JCO, Tbl 1 |
| Usual case fee | child $6,000 · adult $6,480 | net income per case $1,041 | JCO, Tbl 1 |
| Payment terms | 24 months · 14% initial | 62% of patients routinely billed | JCO, Tbl 1 |
| Sources of referrals | GPs 40% · patients 30% · internet 10% · specialists 5% | median % of referrals | JCO, Tbl 9 |
| Case starts by region | South 536 · Midwest 374 · West Central 329 · NE 319 · Pacific 306 | medians | JCO, Tbl 3 |
| Gross billings per owner, pediatric | median $964,880 (2025) | avg $1,086,290 · Q1 $566,210 · Q3 $1,327,430 | ADA HPI, Tbl 7 |
| Patient acquisition cost, pediatric | $44.47 under $1.65M · $25.42 above | 2.97% vs 1.23% of collections | Cain Watters, from client books |
The ADA has gone dark on four of five dental specialties. In the 2026 Survey of Dental Practice only pediatric dentistry cleared the reporting threshold (n=70) — oral surgery n=20, endodontics n=20, orthodontics n=24, periodontics n=27 were all suppressed. A practical consequence worth knowing: any “2025 average orthodontic, endodontic or oral-surgery practice revenue” figure in circulation cannot have come from the ADA.
Veterinary
WHO WE TREAT →Clients, not patients. The pet is the patient; the owner is the revenue unit.
| MEASURE | BASELINE | SPREAD | SOURCE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross revenue per FTE vet — companion exclusive | median $616,667 | Q1 $411,111 · Q3 $867,901 | AVMA 2025 Economic State of the Profession |
| — companion predominant | median $608,553 | Q1 $351,500 · Q3 $760,887 | AVMA 2025, p.47 |
| — mixed animal | median $416,250 | Q1 $277,500 · Q3 $597,396 | AVMA 2025 |
| — all US practices | $554,982 (2024) | down in real terms from ~$600,000 in 2019 | 2025 AVMA Practice Owners Survey |
| Gross revenue per practice | ~$1.5M (2024) | average | AVMA Practice Owners Survey |
| Revenue and visits, LTM | $2.2M revenue · 10.1K visits | revenue +2.1% · visits −2.9% | Vetsource, n=6,184 practices |
| Active clients per practice | 3,351 (2024) | falling ~95 per year since 2019 | AVMA Practice Owners Survey |
| Active clients per FTE vet | 1,499 (2024) | falling ~15 per year | AVMA |
| Revenue per exam room | median $371,500 | companion exclusive · $444,668 all-practice avg | AVMA 2025, p.47 |
| Revenue mix | exams 23.5% · pharmacy 13.6% · lab 12.2% · vaccines 12% · surgery 11.9% | imaging 7% · dentistry 6.3% | 2024 AVMA Owner Survey |
| Average practice profile | 3,845 sq ft · 3.5 exam rooms · 2.76 FTE vets | — | AVMA |
Seven independent datasets — five private, two federal — agree on the same structure: visits down roughly 2–3%, revenue up roughly 2–3%, price doing all the work. The cleanest is the Bureau of Economic Analysis real quantity index, which fell in 2025 while nominal spend rose 3.48%.
Dermatology
WHO WE TREAT →One practice, two businesses. Medical runs on encounters and wRVU; cosmetic runs on consults, units and syringes.
| MEASURE | BASELINE | SPREAD | SOURCE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medicare allowed per dermatologist | median $188,072 | 10th pct $26,773 · 90th pct $777,069 | CMS Medicare PUF CY2024, n=12,616 |
| Services per dermatologist | median 2,522 | 90th pct 9,236 | CMS PUF CY2024 |
| Beneficiaries per dermatologist | median 496 | 90th pct 1,336 | CMS PUF CY2024 |
| Reimbursement spread by procedure | Mohs 1st stage $581.52 · AK destruction (addl) $6.22 | why mix beats volume | CMS, by Geography and Service, CY2024 |
| Mohs by provider type | PAs and NPs render ~33% of biopsies, ~0% of Mohs | 18 of 934,948 services nationally | CMS PUF CY2024 |
| Medspa revenue per location | median $1,860,000 | 75th $2,340,000 · 90th $4,250,000 | Zenoti, 2026 Benchmark Report (CY2025) |
| Medspa average ticket | median $216 | 75th $346 · 90th $484 | Zenoti CY2025 |
| Staff utilization | median 38% | 90th pct 80% — widest gap in any vertical | Zenoti CY2025 |
| Rebooking within 24 hours | 40% average | 69% top earners · 54% top quartile | Zenoti (CY2024) |
| Revenue per service hour | median ~$420 | top decile ~$700 · bottom quartile ~$295 | CorralData, Q1 2026 |
| Paid media spend | ~5% of revenue | 59% Meta / 41% Google | CorralData, Q1 2026 |
The top-decile dermatologist bills 4.1× the median on only 2.7× the patients. The gap is service mix, not panel size — and it is stated by Medicare's own claims file, with no vendor anywhere in the chain.
Behavioral health
WHO WE TREAT →Census and admissions — not new patients. Length of stay, levels of care, verification of benefits.
| MEASURE | BASELINE | SPREAD | SOURCE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median clients per facility | SU with OTP 185 · outpatient MH 15 · inpatient MH 19 · residential MH 7 | March 2024 | SAMHSA N-SUMHSS 2024, Tbls SU12/SU13/MH12 |
| Median length of stay | hospital detox 4d · short-term residential 21d · long-term residential 36d | IOP 40d · non-intensive outpatient 53d | SAMHSA TEDS 2023, Tbl E-4 |
| Average daily census | 17,575 on 23,987 available beds | occupancy 73% | Universal Health Services, FY2025 10-K |
| Average inpatient length of stay | 13.7 days (2025) · 13.6 (2024) | — | UHS FY2025 10-K |
| Same-facility growth | revenue +4.9% · patient days +2.1% · admissions +2.3% | FY2025 | Acadia Healthcare FY2025 10-K |
| Outpatient session rates | self-pay $139.75 · insurance $99.75 | insurance = 58.8% of sessions, up from 55.8% | SimplePractice, 2025 report |
| Facility scale reference | 8,040 clinicians · 572 centers | new center 4,000–5,000 sq ft, 12–15 clinicians | LifeStance FY2025 10-K |
| Inpatient psychiatric margin | average −5% | more than half of 1,738 facilities negative | NABH, from CMS HCRIS |
This is three businesses wearing one name. Residential, intensive outpatient and outpatient therapy differ by an order of magnitude in census, length of stay and economics — and an opioid-treatment-programme split matters more than the residential-versus-outpatient one.
Emergency & urgent care
WHO WE TREAT →Visits per clinic per day. Walk-in led, not appointment led.
| MEASURE | BASELINE | SPREAD | SOURCE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median total patient volume | 56 per day | 50th percentile | UCA 2022 Operations Benchmarking, n=775 |
| Median visits by type | provider 40 · occ-med 5 · workers' comp 4 · nurse 4 | 2022 | UCA 2022, p.9 |
| Average daily visits per center | 2023: 33.13 · 2024: 33.27 · 2025: 33.96 | — | Urgent Care Association |
| Pre-COVID baseline | 30 per clinic per day (2018–19) | April 2020 low: 17.8 | UCA 2021 Spring (Experity data) |
| Median commercial net revenue per visit | $163.91 | bottom-quartile states $130.30 · top $221.72 | Experity — 17,410,492 commercial visits |
| Median allowed by CPT | 99202 $112 · 99203 $145 · 99204 $179 · 99205 $213 | 2023 | FAIR Health, national commercial claims |
| Global fee (S9083) by region | Midwest $110 · South $152 · West $159 · Northeast $167 | 2022 average allowed | FAIR Health |
| Minimum population per center | 18,000 · suburban median 20,000 | — | National UC Realty |
There is no NAICS code for urgent care, so unlike dentistry or veterinary medicine no federal revenue-per-establishment denominator exists for this vertical at all. Seasonality also runs a 39-point peak-to-trough swing, which makes any single annual visits-per-day figure an artefact of when it was measured.
Multi-specialty MSO
WHO WE TREAT →Encounters, wRVU, service lines, referral leakage and capture.
| MEASURE | BASELINE | SPREAD | SOURCE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median total medical revenue per FTE physician | primary care $760,383 | nonsurgical $697,712 · surgical $687,652 | MGMA DataDive Financials & Operations (2024 data) |
| Median total operating cost per FTE physician | $620,098 → $801,938 | +29.3% over five years | MGMA DataDive Cost and Revenue |
| Median loss per physician, system-affiliated | more than $249,000 | revenue $719,901 vs expenses $1,036,238 | AMGA 2023 (5,700+ clinics) |
| Median investment per provider | $175,517 (2023) → $161,592 (2024) | physicians + APCs | AMGA 2024 (7,500+ clinics) |
| Hospital / IDS practice subsidy | $302,160 per FTE physician | +39.7% in one year | MGMA DataDive Cost and Revenue |
| Cost growth vs inflation, 2011–2024 | CPI +39.5% vs operating cost +71.6% / +83.3% | physician-owned / hospital-owned | MGMA DataDive |
| Median surgical specialist compensation | ~$585,000 (2024) | +5.57% year over year | MGMA Provider Compensation (220,000+) |
| Referral loop closure | 34.8% of scheduling attempts completed | 38.9% had no documented status at all | Patel et al., J Gen Intern Med 2018, n=103,737 |
The referral figure is the most important number on this page. It was measured inside a single integrated health system — where capture should be easiest — across 103,737 scheduling attempts. In nearly four cases in ten, the system could not establish whether the patient was ever seen.
Optometry
WHO WE TREAT →Exams and capture rate. A clinical practice bolted to a retail business.
| MEASURE | BASELINE | SPREAD | SOURCE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross revenue per complete exam | median $306 | 90–99th pct $500 · 1st–9th ~$188 | MBA Key Metrics, n>1,900 practices |
| Collected exam revenue per exam | avg $90 · median $79 | insured patients $66 | MBA Key Metrics |
| Direct-pay exam fee | median $127 · avg $134 | 5th pct $68 · 95th pct $205 | MBA Key Metrics |
| Eyewear as % of gross revenue | 43% average | 90–99th pct 62% · 1st–9th 21% | MBA Key Metrics |
| Contact lens materials | 16% average | 90–99th pct 32% · 1st–9th 6% | MBA Key Metrics |
| Eyewear gross margin | 61% median (2.6× markup) | 90–99th pct 75% (4.0×) · $138 gross profit per Rx | MBA Key Metrics |
| Retail sale per pair | $227 median | — | MBA Key Metrics |
| Second-pair sales ratio | 10% median | 5th pct 1% · 95th pct 33% | MBA Key Metrics |
| Marketing spend per complete exam | median $4.11 · average $5.65 | effectively a published acquisition cost | MBA Key Metrics |
| Optical as % of office space | 25% median | smaller practices 30%+ · $1.5M+ practices 22% | MBA Key Metrics |
The MBA Key Metrics series publishes the full decile distribution for every metric, and discloses its own upward sampling bias in writing — which is rarer than it should be. It is also a 2015 edition with no free successor, so treat the levels as dated and the distribution shape as the durable finding.
PE platforms & rollups
WHO WE TREAT →Adjusted EBITDA, same-store growth, add-ons, entry and exit multiples. The one setting where acquisition cost and payback are native.
| MEASURE | BASELINE | SPREAD | SOURCE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global healthcare PE deal value | record, more than $190B (2025) | 445 buyouts — second-highest on record | Bain, Global Healthcare PE Report 2026 |
| Provider and related services | ~$62B, up 57% year over year | healthcare IT within provider doubled to ~$32B | Bain 2026 |
| Exit value | $54B (2024) → $156B (2025) | exits above $1B: 16 → more than 40 | Bain 2026 |
| Sponsor-to-sponsor | more than 150 deals, more than $120B | more than 30 above $1B, versus 8 in 2024 | Bain 2026 |
| DSO platform multiples | buy practices 5–6× · sell platform 9–10× | down from 13–16× at the peak | Colao / Dykema |
Bain's deal counts exclude add-on transactions below $250 million — which is essentially every tuck-in a mid-market platform actually executes. Bain measures the top of the market accurately and the rollup middle not at all. Cited here for direction, not for a middle-market denominator.
Acquisition cost — where it exists, and where it does not
We went looking for a credible cost-per-new-patient benchmark in all nine specialties. In three we found one. In three it does not exist at any tier we would cite — and the reason is structural: the ADA's own Survey of Dental Practice aggregates every practice expense into a single figure and never breaks out advertising, so there is nothing to derive from. Every percentage in circulation traces back to a vendor with no disclosed sample.
| SPECIALTY | STATUS | WHAT IS ACTUALLY PUBLISHED |
|---|---|---|
| Specialty dental — pediatric | Published | $26.46 average; $44.47 under $1.65M vs $25.42 above Cain Watters, from client books |
| Optometry | Published | Marketing spend per complete exam — median $4.11 MBA Key Metrics |
| Dermatology — cosmetic | Partial | Paid media ≈ 5% of revenue CorralData |
| Behavioral health | Native term only | “Cost per admission” is the vocabulary; no benchmark located |
| Multi-specialty MSO | Gated | Obtainable behind MGMA membership MGMA DataDive |
| DSO / general dentistry | Does not exist | ADA HPI aggregates all practice expenses and never breaks out advertising |
| Veterinary | Does not exist | Unpublished by every institutional and capital-tier source located |
| Emergency & urgent care | Does not exist | No credible source located |
This is worth stating plainly: if a marketing agency quotes you an industry patient acquisition cost for dentistry, veterinary medicine or urgent care, it is quoting a figure no institution measured. We build yours from your own spend and your own instrumented new-patient count instead.
A reference range tells you where you stand. It does not tell you what is holding you there — that is what the examination is for.
APPLY — 6 / QUARTER →